Rollup merge of #103644 - catlee:catlee/option-question-mark-docs, r=workingjubilee

Add docs for question mark operator for Option

As a beginner learning rust, it took me a while to figure out what `?` was doing with Options. I think the documentation of this could be improved.

I've used the question mark documentation from the `Result` type as a template here, and tried to come up with a simple example as well.

Author: matthiaskrgr

library/core/src/option.rs

@@ -72,6 +72,50 @@
 //! }
 //! ```
 //!
+//! # The question mark operator, `?`
+//!
+//! Similar to the [`Result`] type, when writing code that calls many functions that return the
+//! [`Option`] type, handling `Some`/`None` can be tedious. The question mark
+//! operator, [`?`], hides some of the boilerplate of propagating values
+//! up the call stack.
+//!
+//! It replaces this:
+//!
+//! ```
+//! # #![allow(dead_code)]
+//! fn add_last_numbers(stack: &mut Vec<i32>) -> Option<i32> {
+//!     let a = stack.pop();
+//!     let b = stack.pop();
+//!
+//!     match (a, b) {
+//!         (Some(x), Some(y)) => Some(x + y),
+//!         _ => None,
+//!     }
+//! }
+//!
+//! ```
+//!
+//! With this:
+//!
+//! ```
+//! # #![allow(dead_code)]
+//! fn add_last_numbers(stack: &mut Vec<i32>) -> Option<i32> {
+//!     Some(stack.pop()? + stack.pop()?)
+//! }
+//! ```
+//!
+//! *It's much nicer!*
+//!
+//! Ending the expression with [`?`] will result in the [`Some`]'s unwrapped value, unless the
+//! result is [`None`], in which case [`None`] is returned early from the enclosing function.
+//!
+//! [`?`] can be used in functions that return [`Option`] because of the
+//! early return of [`None`] that it provides.
+//!
+//! [`?`]: crate::ops::Try
+//! [`Some`]: Some
+//! [`None`]: None
+//!
 //! # Representation
 //!
 //! Rust guarantees to optimize the following types `T` such that

library/core/src/result.rs

@@ -209,11 +209,10 @@
 //!
 //! *It's much nicer!*
 //!
-//! Ending the expression with [`?`] will result in the unwrapped
-//! success ([`Ok`]) value, unless the result is [`Err`], in which case
-//! [`Err`] is returned early from the enclosing function.
+//! Ending the expression with [`?`] will result in the [`Ok`]'s unwrapped value, unless the result
+//! is [`Err`], in which case [`Err`] is returned early from the enclosing function.
 //!
-//! [`?`] can only be used in functions that return [`Result`] because of the
+//! [`?`] can be used in functions that return [`Result`] because of the
 //! early return of [`Err`] that it provides.
 //!
 //! [`expect`]: Result::expect