|
| 1 | +// run-pass |
| 2 | +// ignore-emscripten no processes |
| 3 | +// ignore-sgx no processes |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +use std::env; |
| 6 | +use std::fs; |
| 7 | +use std::path::Path; |
| 8 | +use std::process::Command; |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +fn main() { |
| 11 | + // Checks the behavior of current_dir when used with a relative exe path. |
| 12 | + let me = env::current_exe().unwrap(); |
| 13 | + if matches!(env::args().skip(1).next().as_deref(), Some("current-dir")) { |
| 14 | + let cwd = env::current_dir().unwrap(); |
| 15 | + assert_eq!(cwd.file_name().unwrap(), "bar"); |
| 16 | + std::process::exit(0); |
| 17 | + } |
| 18 | + let exe = me.file_name().unwrap(); |
| 19 | + let cwd = me.parent().unwrap(); |
| 20 | + eprintln!("cwd={:?}", cwd); |
| 21 | + // Change directory to where the exectuable is located, since this test |
| 22 | + // fundamentally needs to use relative paths. In some cases (like |
| 23 | + // remote-test-server), the current_dir can be somewhere else, so make |
| 24 | + // sure it is something we can use. We assume we can write to this |
| 25 | + // directory. |
| 26 | + env::set_current_dir(&cwd).unwrap(); |
| 27 | + let foo = cwd.join("foo"); |
| 28 | + let bar = cwd.join("bar"); |
| 29 | + fs::create_dir_all(&foo).unwrap(); |
| 30 | + fs::create_dir_all(&bar).unwrap(); |
| 31 | + fs::copy(&me, foo.join(exe)).unwrap(); |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + // Unfortunately this is inconsistent based on the platform, see |
| 34 | + // https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37868. On Windows, |
| 35 | + // it is relative *before* changing the directory, and on Unix |
| 36 | + // it is *after* changing the directory. |
| 37 | + let relative_exe = if cfg!(windows) { |
| 38 | + Path::new("foo").join(exe) |
| 39 | + } else { |
| 40 | + Path::new("../foo").join(exe) |
| 41 | + }; |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + let status = Command::new(relative_exe) |
| 44 | + .arg("current-dir") |
| 45 | + .current_dir("bar") |
| 46 | + .status() |
| 47 | + .unwrap(); |
| 48 | + assert!(status.success()); |
| 49 | +} |
0 commit comments