Skip to content

Commit 7c29dd8

Browse files
Merge pull request #6521 from U007D/master
Update RFC, MCP, FCP and CFT sections for TWiR-593
2 parents 5e9d716 + 136077a commit 7c29dd8

File tree

1 file changed

+27
-46
lines changed

1 file changed

+27
-46
lines changed

Diff for: draft/2025-04-02-this-week-in-rust.md

+27-46
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -64,29 +64,19 @@ Thanks to [Tomer Filiba](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704/14
6464
[submit_crate]: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
6565

6666
## Calls for Testing
67-
6867
An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
69-
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
70-
RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
71-
72-
<!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
73-
* [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
74-
* [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
75-
* [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
76-
-->
77-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
78-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
79-
<!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
68+
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.
8069

81-
### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
82-
83-
### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing)
70+
If you are a feature implementer
71+
and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a `call-for-testing` label to your RFC along
72+
with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
73+
need testing.
8474

85-
### [Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing)
75+
* *No calls for testing were issued this week by [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing),
76+
[Rust language RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing) or
77+
[Rustup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing).*
8678

87-
If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new `call-for-testing`
88-
label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
89-
need testing.
79+
[Let us know](https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues) if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.
9080

9181
## Call for Participation; projects and speakers
9282

@@ -192,47 +182,38 @@ Revision range: [4510e86a..2ea33b59](https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=4510e86a4
192182
Changes to Rust follow the Rust [RFC (request for comments) process](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs). These
193183
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
194184

195-
<!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
196-
<!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
197-
<!-- * []() -->
198-
199-
<!--
200-
### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
201-
<!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
202-
<!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
203-
-->
185+
* *No RFCs were approved this week.*
204186

205187
### Final Comment Period
206188

207189
Every week, [the team](https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
208190
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
209191

210-
#### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
211-
<!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
212-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
213-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
214-
215192
#### Tracking Issues & PRs
216-
<!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
217-
<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: -->
218-
<!-- * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
219-
<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
220-
221193
##### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
194+
* [Tracking Issue for slice::array_chunks](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74985)
195+
* [Stabilize `cfg_boolean_literals`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138632)
196+
* [Promise `array::from_fn is generated in order of increasing indices`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139099)
197+
* [Stabilize `repr128`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138285)
198+
* [Stabilize `naked_functions`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134213)
199+
* [Fix missing const for inherent pointer `replace` methods](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136877)
222200

223-
##### [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
201+
##### [Rust RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
202+
* [core::marker::NoCell in bounds (previously known an [sic] `Freeze`)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3633)
224203

225-
##### [Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+)
204+
##### [Cargo](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc),
205+
* [Stabilize automatic garbage collection.](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/14287)
226206

227-
##### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
207+
#### Other Areas
208+
* No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
209+
[Language Team](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+),
210+
[Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc) or
211+
[Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc).
228212

229-
##### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
213+
Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.
230214

231215
#### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
232-
<!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
233-
<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
234-
<!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
235-
<!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
216+
* [Allow `&&`, `||`, and `!` in `cfg`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3796)
236217

237218
## Upcoming Events
238219

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)