@@ -64,29 +64,19 @@ Thanks to [Tomer Filiba](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704/14
64
64
[ submit_crate ] : https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
65
65
66
66
## Calls for Testing
67
-
68
67
An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
69
- implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
70
- RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
71
-
72
- <!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
73
- * [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
74
- * [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
75
- * [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
76
- -->
77
- <!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
78
- <!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
79
- <!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
68
+ implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.
80
69
81
- ### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing )
82
-
83
- ### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing )
70
+ If you are a feature implementer
71
+ and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a ` call-for-testing ` label to your RFC along
72
+ with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
73
+ need testing.
84
74
85
- ### [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing )
75
+ * * No calls for testing were issued this week by [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing ) ,
76
+ [ Rust language RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing ) or
77
+ [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing ) .*
86
78
87
- If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new ` call-for-testing `
88
- label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
89
- need testing.
79
+ [ Let us know] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues ) if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.
90
80
91
81
## Call for Participation; projects and speakers
92
82
@@ -192,47 +182,38 @@ Revision range: [4510e86a..2ea33b59](https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=4510e86a4
192
182
Changes to Rust follow the Rust [ RFC (request for comments) process] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs ) . These
193
183
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
194
184
195
- <!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
196
- <!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
197
- <!-- * []() -->
198
-
199
- <!--
200
- ### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
201
- <!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
202
- <!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
203
- -->
185
+ * * No RFCs were approved this week.*
204
186
205
187
### Final Comment Period
206
188
207
189
Every week, [ the team] ( https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html ) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
208
190
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
209
191
210
- #### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period )
211
- <!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
212
- <!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
213
- <!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
214
-
215
192
#### Tracking Issues & PRs
216
- <!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
217
- <!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: -->
218
- <!-- * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
219
- <!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
220
-
221
193
##### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
194
+ * [ Tracking Issue for slice::array_chunks] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74985 )
195
+ * [ Stabilize ` cfg_boolean_literals ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138632 )
196
+ * [ Promise ` array::from_fn is generated in order of increasing indices ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139099 )
197
+ * [ Stabilize ` repr128 ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138285 )
198
+ * [ Stabilize ` naked_functions ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134213 )
199
+ * [ Fix missing const for inherent pointer ` replace ` methods] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136877 )
222
200
223
- ##### [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
201
+ ##### [ Rust RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period )
202
+ * [ core::marker::NoCell in bounds (previously known an [ sic] ` Freeze ` )] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3633 )
224
203
225
- ##### [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ )
204
+ ##### [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) ,
205
+ * [ Stabilize automatic garbage collection.] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/14287 )
226
206
227
- ##### [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
207
+ #### Other Areas
208
+ * No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
209
+ [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ ) ,
210
+ [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) or
211
+ [ Unsafe Code Guidelines] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) .
228
212
229
- ##### [ Unsafe Code Guidelines ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
213
+ Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.
230
214
231
215
#### [ New and Updated RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls )
232
- <!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
233
- <!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
234
- <!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
235
- <!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
216
+ * [ Allow ` && ` , ` || ` , and ` ! ` in ` cfg ` ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3796 )
236
217
237
218
## Upcoming Events
238
219
0 commit comments