Strenghten eval-java-protected-members test

Author: adpi2

Diff for: compiler/src/dotty/tools/debug/ExtractExpression.scala

@@ -283,7 +283,11 @@ private class ExtractExpression(config: ExpressionCompilerConfig, expressionStor
   private def isLocalVariable(symbol: Symbol)(using Context): Boolean =
     !symbol.is(Method) && symbol.isLocalToBlock
 
-  // Check if a term is accessible from the expression class
+  /** Check if a term is accessible from the expression class.
+   *  At this phase, there is no need test privateWithin, as it will no longer be checked.
+   *  This eliminates the need to use reflection to evaluate privateWithin members,
+   *  which would otherwise degrade performances.
+   */
   private def isAccessibleMember(tree: Tree)(using Context): Boolean =
     val symbol = tree.symbol
     symbol.owner.isType &&

Diff for: tests/debug/eval-java-protected-members.check

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 break Test$ 3
-eval A.x1
+eval example.A.x1
 result x1
-eval A.x1 = "y1"; A.x1
+eval example.A.x1 = "y1"; example.A.x1
 result y1
-eval A.m1()
+eval example.A.m1()
 result m1
 eval x2
 result x2

Diff for: tests/debug/eval-java-protected-members/A.java

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-class A {
+package example;
+
+public class A {
   protected static String x1 = "x1";
   protected static String m1() {
     return "m1";

Diff for: tests/debug/eval-java-protected-members/Test.scala

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-object Test extends A:
+object Test extends example.A:
   def main(args: Array[String]): Unit =
     println("Hello, World!")