Make naming of @Configuration class processing-related artifacts consistent [SPR-5600] #10271
Labels
in: core
Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression)
type: enhancement
A general enhancement
Milestone
Chris Beams opened SPR-5600 and commented
AbstractConfigurationClassProcessor -> AbstractConfigurationClassPostProcessor
ConfigurationEnhancer -> ConfigurationClassEnhancer
ConfigurationParser -> ConfigurationClassParser
Also update corresponding unit test class names to match
Attachments:
Referenced from: commits cc713ad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: