You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 11, 2023. It is now read-only.
Instead it should make a warning, and I'd say continue to use the old route untill it's deleted.
Since in development flow it would be nice to not have to restart the server :).
/home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/dist/core.ts.js:204
throw new Error("The " + a.file + " and " + b.file + " routes clash");
^
Error: The inventory/index.html and inventory.html routes clash
at /home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/dist/core.ts.js:204:15
at Array.sort (native)
at Object.create_routes (/home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/dist/core.ts.js:172:10)
at FSWatcher.<anonymous> (/home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/dist/dev.ts.js:164:51)
at emitTwo (events.js:126:13)
at FSWatcher.emit (events.js:214:7)
at FSWatcher.<anonymous> (/home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:199:15)
at FSWatcher._emit (/home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:241:5)
at FSWatcher.NodeFsHandler._handleFile (/home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/node_modules/chokidar/lib/nodefs-handler.js:276:10)
at FSWatcher.<anonymous> (/home/dexter/.nvm/versions/node/v8.10.0/lib/node_modules/sapper/node_modules/chokidar/lib/nodefs-handler.js:474:21)
at FSReqWrap.oncomplete (fs.js:153:5)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm encountering this too...I admit my use case is weird, but I have index.html and index.pug files sitting right next to each other. In my Sapper update, things won't run any longer so I have to figure out what to do...
Instead it should make a warning, and I'd say continue to use the old route untill it's deleted.
Since in development flow it would be nice to not have to restart the server :).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: