Skip to content

utplsql-cli isn't aware of --coverage-schemes parameter #195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
alesana-san opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

utplsql-cli isn't aware of --coverage-schemes parameter #195

alesana-san opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@alesana-san
Copy link

Hi!

Looks like utplsql-cli doesn't pick up --coverage-schemes parameters described on README.md page of project:

user@host MINGW64 ~/Downloads/utPLSQL-cli/bin
$ ./utplsql run user/pass@dbhost:1521/odb1 \
> -p=some_path \
> -f=UT_COVERAGE_HTML_REPORTER \
> -o=result.html \
> --coverage-schemes=SCOTT
Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Duser.language=en
Unknown option: --coverage-schemes=SCOTT
Possible solutions: --color

My version is:

$ ./utplsql info
Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Duser.language=en
utPLSQL-cli 3.1.8-SNAPSHOT.local
utPLSQL-java-api 3.1.8.546
@alesana-san alesana-san changed the title utplsql-cli doesn't aware of --coverage-schemes parameter utplsql-cli isn't aware of --coverage-schemes parameter Mar 26, 2021
@pesse
Copy link
Member

pesse commented Jun 10, 2021

Hey @alesana-san
the problem is fixed in the code (see #180), but there is not a new release yet and I need to deal with some devops stuff, since BinTray is no more.
I start working on the project again, so I hope to get a new release out soon that solves this.

@netlink128
Copy link

Hello, everyone!
Any news with this bug?

@jgebal jgebal added this to the 3.1.9 milestone Jan 16, 2023
@jgebal
Copy link
Member

jgebal commented Jan 16, 2023

Released

@jgebal jgebal closed this as completed Jan 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants