You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: doc/howto/remove-silent-labels-textgrid.md
+12-7
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -83,9 +83,11 @@ Here's the steps we'll follow:
83
83
84
84
For this vignette, we use annotations from the
85
85
[Bengalese finch song dataset](https://osf.io/r6paq/),
86
-
by Tachibana and Morita 2021, adapted under
86
+
by Tachibana and Morita 2021[^1], adapted under
87
87
[CC BY 4.0 License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
88
88
89
+
[^1]: Tachibana, R. O., & Morita, T. (2021). Bengalese finch song dataset. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R6PAQ
90
+
89
91
+++
90
92
91
93
## 0. Write code for analysis
@@ -97,14 +99,14 @@ and test it with some toy data that you generate.
97
99
We also do this first to help understand what format we're going to need to get our data into below.
98
100
99
101
Our goal here is to fit a first-order Markov model of the transition probabilities in the song of Bengalese finches.
100
-
This model has been used in several previous studies[^1][^2],
101
-
although it was later shown[^3] that such a model does not completely describe the statistics of the song.
102
+
This model has been used in several previous studies[^2][^3],
103
+
although it was later shown[^4] that such a model does not completely describe the statistics of the song.
102
104
In spite of that, a first-order Markov model is very convenient to fit,
103
105
and can give us a useful first-order approximation (literally!) of singing behavior.
104
106
105
-
[^1]: Woolley SM, Rubel EW (1997) Bengalese finches lonchura striata domestica depend upon auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song. J Neurosci 17: 6380–90.
106
-
[^2]: Honda E, Okanoya K (1999) Acoustical and syntactical comparisons between songs of the white-backed munia (lonchura striata) and its domesticated strain, the bengalese finch (lonchura striata var. domestica). Zool Sci 16: 319–326.
107
-
[^3]: Jin DZ, Kozhevnikov AA (2011) A Compact Statistical Model of the Song Syntax in Bengalese Finch. PLOS Computational Biology 7(3): e1001108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001108
107
+
[^2]: Woolley SM, Rubel EW (1997) Bengalese finches lonchura striata domestica depend upon auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song. J Neurosci 17: 6380–90.
108
+
[^3]: Honda E, Okanoya K (1999) Acoustical and syntactical comparisons between songs of the white-backed munia (lonchura striata) and its domesticated strain, the bengalese finch (lonchura striata var. domestica). Zool Sci 16: 319–326.
109
+
[^4]: Jin DZ, Kozhevnikov AA (2011) A Compact Statistical Model of the Song Syntax in Bengalese Finch. PLOS Computational Biology 7(3): e1001108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001108
108
110
109
111
To build such a model for Bengalese finch song,
110
112
we consider the song syllables to be states.
@@ -140,7 +142,7 @@ when it computes the transition matrix.
0 commit comments