Skip to content

Commit 35b685d

Browse files
committed
update riot comparison
1 parent cc15f82 commit 35b685d

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-3
lines changed

Diff for: src/v2/guide/comparison.md

+2-3
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -321,8 +321,7 @@ It is also totally feasible to offer deeper integration between Vue with Web Com
321321

322322
Riot 2.0 provides a similar component-based development model (which is called a "tag" in Riot), with a minimal and beautifully designed API. Riot and Vue probably share a lot in design philosophies. However, despite being a bit heavier than Riot, Vue does offer some significant advantages:
323323

324-
- True conditional rendering. Riot renders all if branches and simply shows/hides them.
324+
- [Transition effect system](transitions.html). Riot has none.
325325
- A far more powerful router. Riot’s routing API is extremely minimal.
326+
- Better performance. Riot [traverses a DOM tree](http://riotjs.com/compare/#virtual-dom-vs-expressions-binding) rather than using a virtual DOM, so suffers from the same performance issues as Angular 1.
326327
- More mature tooling support. Vue provides official support for [Webpack](https://github.com/vuejs/vue-loader) and [Browserify](https://github.com/vuejs/vueify), while Riot relies on community support for build system integration.
327-
- [Transition effect system](transitions.html). Riot has none.
328-
- Better performance. [Despite advertising](https://github.com/vuejs/vuejs.org/issues/346) use of a virtual DOM, Riot in fact uses dirty checking and thus suffers from the same performance issues as Angular 1.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)