Skip to content

Removed Reason from CheckNameAvailability_Available.json in DeviceUpdate #13914

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2021

Conversation

abatishchev
Copy link
Contributor

@abatishchev abatishchev commented Apr 13, 2021

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When you are targeting to deploy new service/feature to public regions? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  3. When you expect to publish swagger? Please provide date, or month to public if date is not available yet.
  4. If it's an update to existing version, please select SDKs of specific language and CLIs that require refresh after swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No, no need to refresh for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Ensure to copy the existing version into new directory structure for first commit (including refactoring) and then push new changes including version updates in separate commits. This is required to review the changes efficiently.
    • Adding a new service
  • Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@abatishchev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 13, 2021

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Apr 13, 2021

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 3d15327. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./initScript.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	go run ./tools/generator/main.go ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️preview/deviceupdate/mgmt/2020-03-01-preview/deviceupdate [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
    info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] - Const `User` type has been changed from `Origin` to `CreatedByType`
    info	[Changelog] - Const `System` has been removed
    info	[Changelog] - Const `Usersystem` has been removed
    info	[Changelog] - Struct `ErrorDefinition` has been removed
    info	[Changelog] - Field `Details` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
    info	[Changelog] - Field `AdditionalInfo` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
    info	[Changelog] - Field `Code` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
    info	[Changelog] - Field `Message` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
    info	[Changelog] - Field `Target` of struct `ErrorResponse` has been removed
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] ### New Content
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] - New const `None`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `AlreadyExists`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `Key`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `ManagedIdentity`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `OriginUsersystem`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `OriginUser`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `SystemAssigned`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `Application`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `Invalid`
    info	[Changelog] - New const `OriginSystem`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleResourceIdentityTypeValues() []ResourceIdentityType`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `BaseClient.CheckNameAvailabilityResponder(*http.Response) (CheckNameAvailabilityResponse, error)`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `BaseClient.CheckNameAvailability(context.Context, CheckNameAvailabilityRequest) (CheckNameAvailabilityResponse, error)`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleCreatedByTypeValues() []CreatedByType`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `PossibleCheckNameAvailabilityReasonValues() []CheckNameAvailabilityReason`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `BaseClient.CheckNameAvailabilityPreparer(context.Context, CheckNameAvailabilityRequest) (*http.Request, error)`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `Identity.MarshalJSON() ([]byte, error)`
    info	[Changelog] - New function `BaseClient.CheckNameAvailabilitySender(*http.Request) (*http.Response, error)`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `CheckNameAvailabilityRequest`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `CheckNameAvailabilityResponse`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `ErrorDetail`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `Identity`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `SystemData`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `SystemData` in struct `Account`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `Account`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `Identity` in struct `AccountUpdate`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `Error` in struct `ErrorResponse`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `SystemData` in struct `Instance`
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] Total 6 breaking change(s), 32 additive change(s).
    info	[Changelog]
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 3d15327. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
    command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-deviceupdate [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
    info	[Changelog] **Features**
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog]   - Model AccountUpdate has a new parameter identity
    info	[Changelog]   - Model Instance has a new parameter system_data
    info	[Changelog]   - Model Account has a new parameter identity
    info	[Changelog]   - Model Account has a new parameter system_data
    info	[Changelog]   - Added operation group DeviceUpdateOperationsMixin
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] **Breaking changes**
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog]   - Model ErrorResponse has a new signature
️️✔️[Staging] ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@abatishchev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@abatishchev
Copy link
Contributor Author

abatishchev commented Apr 14, 2021

@raych1 do you know who can take a look at the Go SDK failures? It wasn't failing in the another PR for the same change and I don't know why this one triggers a failure.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi @abatishchev, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.

@raych1 raych1 self-assigned this Apr 14, 2021
@raych1
Copy link
Member

raych1 commented Apr 14, 2021

@ArcturusZhang , can you have a look at GO SDK failures?

@abatishchev
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants