Skip to content

[Tables] Updating EntityProperty #18177

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 4, 2021

Conversation

seankane-msft
Copy link
Member

  • type changed to edm_type
  • Removed type inferences
  • edm_type and value are both required arguments now

@seankane-msft seankane-msft requested a review from annatisch April 20, 2021 20:02
@seankane-msft seankane-msft self-assigned this Apr 20, 2021
@ghost ghost added the Tables label Apr 20, 2021
@seankane-msft seankane-msft requested a review from annatisch April 29, 2021 18:48
@check-enforcer
Copy link

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run python - [service] - ci

@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ def _add_entity_properties(source):
elif isinstance(value, datetime):
mtype, value = _to_entity_datetime(value)
elif isinstance(value, EntityProperty):
conv = _EDM_TO_ENTITY_CONVERSIONS.get(value.type)
conv = _EDM_TO_ENTITY_CONVERSIONS.get(value.edm_type)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should remove the isinstance check, and instead treat this as a generic tuple....

elif isinstance(value, tuple):  # ideally we wouldn't do the instance check at all here.... 
    conv = _EDM_TO_ENTITY_CONVERSIONS.get(value[1])
    ...
    mtype, value = conv(value[0])

entity.test2 = u'value'
entity.test3 = 3
entity.test4 = EntityProperty(1234567890)
entity.test4 = EntityProperty(1234567890, EdmType.INT32)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be good to either add a test, or modify one of the existing ones to just use naked tuples:
entity.test4 = (1234567890, 'Edm.Int32')

@seankane-msft seankane-msft requested a review from annatisch April 30, 2021 17:31
@annatisch
Copy link
Member

/azp run python - tables - tests

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@annatisch annatisch merged commit 61971ae into Azure:master May 4, 2021
@seankane-msft seankane-msft deleted the tables-entityproperty branch May 4, 2021 14:19
iscai-msft added a commit to iscai-msft/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request May 5, 2021
…into azure_purview_catalog

* 'master' of https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python: (109 commits)
  [Tables] Adds support for AzureNamedKeyCredential (Azure#18456)
  [Tables] delete_entity takes an entity instead of row and partition key (Azure#18269)
  [Tables] Removed TableEntity attribute wrapper (Azure#18489)
  [EventHub&ServiceBus] Bump uAMQP dependency (Azure#17942)
  [ServiceBus] add keyword override support to update_ methods in mgmt module (Azure#18210)
  Add compatibility switch to disable CAE (Azure#18148)
  Service Bus Named Key Credential (Azure#18471)
  Change to use dynamic resource connection string for chat tests and identity samples (Azure#18502)
  Increase dependency (Azure#18500)
  show detailed error (Azure#18229)
  prerelease (Azure#18507)
  [Container Registry] addressing issues (Azure#18486)
  update per_call_policies & per_retry_policies (Azure#18406)
  Eh named key (Azure#18292)
  [Tables] Updating EntityProperty (Azure#18177)
  [Service Bus] fix async auth test (Azure#18499)
  [communication] Live Testing - Introduce CloudConfig into test.yml  (Azure#18469)
  Release azure-servicefabric 8.0 (Azure#18488)
  [Communication]: Updated test_search_available_phone_numbers_with_invalid_country_code async test to be consistent with sync test (Azure#18466)
  [Container Registry] DeleteRepositoryResult Changed (Azure#18443)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants