Skip to content

Add CredScan cleanup guide #22750

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2022
Merged

Add CredScan cleanup guide #22750

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2022

Conversation

mccoyp
Copy link
Member

@mccoyp mccoyp commented Jan 25, 2022

Description

This adds a guide for cleaning up CredScan warnings so that package owners can clean up warnings for packages they own, on their own.

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • N/A Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

@check-enforcer
Copy link

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment:
/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run python - [service] - ci

@mccoyp mccoyp requested a review from weshaggard January 25, 2022 17:29

## Check CredScan status

CredScan is run each night over the entire `azure-sdk-for-python` repository as part of the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are considering to add the CredScan check inside of PR validation in .NET repo and once we get that figured out we could do that similarly in python repo if you guys feel that would be helpful for you guys.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would definitely be great to implement once that's ready! I synced with Sima about the PR validation work and think it'll be a great solution moving forward. This guide will hopefully help Python cut through our current backlog of CredScan warnings and get us in a position to use PR validation.

fake credential files, but strings in that file will still trigger warnings if present in another unsuppressed file.
Files that contain more than just fake credentials shouldn't be suppressed.

Credential warnings are suppressed in [eng/CredScanSuppression.json][suppression_file]. Suppressed string values are in
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is recommended to try and reuse an existing placeholder instead of adding new ones.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed -- I hope that's clear in this doc. Do you think this list of suppression options is accurate, in terms of which options are preferable?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I think that does cover it but I guess I missed it reading through the other text. Perhaps it might be worth moving up those steps so it is nice summary and add the text after for more details about the specifics.

Credential warnings are suppressed in [eng/CredScanSuppression.json][suppression_file]. Suppressed string values are in
the `"placeholder"` list, and suppressed files are in the `"file"` list under `"suppressions"`.

Ideally, fake credential files -- which contain nothing but fake secrets -- should be suppressed and their fake
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you suppress an entire file that entire file should only contain fake secrets. We should never suppress an entire file if there is other normal code because we don't want to accidently allow other secrets to slip in a file.

@mccoyp
Copy link
Member Author

mccoyp commented Jan 25, 2022

/check-enforcer override

@mccoyp mccoyp merged commit 18611ef into Azure:main Jan 25, 2022
@mccoyp mccoyp deleted the credscan-doc branch January 25, 2022 19:09
@sima-zhu
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for drafting this! We will use this as initial template.

rakshith91 pushed a commit to rakshith91/azure-sdk-for-python that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants