Skip to content

Add Azure ML job CODEOWNERS #26644

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

DouglasXiaoMS
Copy link
Contributor

@DouglasXiaoMS DouglasXiaoMS commented Oct 5, 2022

Description

Please add an informative description that covers that changes made by the pull request and link all relevant issues.

If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

@DouglasXiaoMS DouglasXiaoMS merged commit 85c9982 into main Oct 5, 2022
@DouglasXiaoMS DouglasXiaoMS deleted the DouglasXiaoMS/jobCodeOwners branch October 5, 2022 18:34
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
# PRLabel: %Local Endpoints
/sdk/ml/azure-ai-ml/azure/ai/ml/_local_endpoints/ @NonStatic2014 @arunsu @stanley-msft @JustinFirsching

# PRLabel: %Job
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This label is way too general. Can we please find a more specific label that better encapsulates this service?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the comments, will modify in the future if too many pr requests
so far my team would own all pull requests related to jobs

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes repository automation and reporting difficult, as we use labels as identifiers for a lot of logic. Let's please adjust the label name to something more specific to this service.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about something like ML Job?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perfect. We should probably apply the same pattern to "Local Endpoints" as well to keep the pattern predictable

jsquire added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
# Summary

The focus of these changes is to capture updates to CODEOWNERS for service owners and new PR paths/labels.

# Related

- #26637
- #26644
- #26574
jsquire added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2022
# Summary

The focus of these changes is to capture updates to CODEOWNERS for service owners and new PR paths/labels.

# Related

- #26637
- #26644
- #26574
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants