Skip to content

[msal-common][msal-node] Move authority generation from common to node #1537

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 12, 2020

Conversation

sangonzal
Copy link
Contributor

This PR moves authority creation from msal-common to msal-node. Instead of creating an authority for every client, we now just create one per application object, and pass this in to msal-common.

Copy link
Contributor

@DarylThayil DarylThayil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good and well tested!

Copy link
Contributor

@pkanher617 pkanher617 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of nitpicks and questions around design.

@sangonzal sangonzal changed the base branch from sagonzal/msal-node-refresh-flow to dev May 5, 2020 15:30
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 5, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.02%) to 81.062% when pulling 57691c0 on sagonzal/msal-node-authority into 34b4733 on dev.

Copy link
Member

@sameerag sameerag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm. Made some comments and feel free to address them as you see fit.

@sangonzal sangonzal merged commit d259eba into dev May 12, 2020
@sangonzal sangonzal deleted the sagonzal/msal-node-authority branch June 2, 2020 21:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants