Skip to content

Add BitcoinRpcNetworkProvider #89

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

blockparty-sh
Copy link
Contributor

This adds a new network for interacting directly with a bitcoin cash node over rpc. It is based on http://github.com/blockparty-sh/cashscript-regtest

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #89 (0e49506) into master (907a5f8) will decrease coverage by 0.42%.
The diff coverage is 18.18%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #89      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.02%   94.59%   -0.43%     
==========================================
  Files          36       37       +1     
  Lines        1969     1980      +11     
  Branches      257      257              
==========================================
+ Hits         1871     1873       +2     
- Misses         93      102       +9     
  Partials        5        5              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../cashscript/src/network/ElectrumNetworkProvider.ts 85.96% <ø> (ø)
...ashscript/src/network/BitcoinRpcNetworkProvider.ts 18.18% <18.18%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 907a5f8...0e49506. Read the comment docs.

@rkalis rkalis changed the title Add bitcoin rpc network Add BitcoinRpcNetworkProvider Feb 16, 2021
@rkalis rkalis merged commit 772eadc into CashScript:master Feb 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants