chore(iast): add more iast tests types

[avara1986]

Checklist

• PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
• The PR description includes an overview of the change
• The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
• The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
• The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
• Newly-added code is easy to change
• The change follows the library release note guidelines
• The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
• Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

• Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
• Title is accurate
• All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
• Avoids breaking API changes
• Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
• Newly-added code is easy to change
• Release note makes sense to a user of the library
• If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
• Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

ddtrace/appsec/_iast/_ast/visitor.py                                    @DataDog/asm-python
ddtrace/appsec/_iast/_handlers.py                                       @DataDog/asm-python
ddtrace/appsec/_iast/_patches/json_tainting.py                          @DataDog/asm-python
ddtrace/appsec/_iast/_taint_tracking/aspects.py                         @DataDog/asm-python
ddtrace/appsec/_iast/_taint_utils.py                                    @DataDog/asm-python
ddtrace/appsec/_iast/taint_sinks/_base.py                               @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/iast/aspects/aspect_utils.py                               @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/iast/aspects/test_add_aspect.py                            @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/iast/aspects/test_common_aspects.py                        @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/iast/iast_utils.py                                         @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/iast/taint_sinks/test_sql_injection.py                     @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/integrations/django_tests/django_app/settings.py           @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/integrations/django_tests/django_app/urls.py               @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/integrations/django_tests/django_app/views.py              @DataDog/asm-python
tests/appsec/integrations/django_tests/test_django_appsec_iast.py       @DataDog/asm-python

[github-actions]

Bootstrap import analysis

Comparison of import times between this PR and base.

Summary

The average import time from this PR is: 235 ± 3 ms.

The average import time from base is: 233 ± 2 ms.

The import time difference between this PR and base is: 2.2 ± 0.1 ms.

Import time breakdown

The following import paths have shrunk:

ddtrace.auto 1.699 ms (0.72%)

ddtrace.bootstrap.sitecustomize 1.041 ms (0.44%)

ddtrace.bootstrap.preload 1.041 ms (0.44%)

ddtrace.internal.products 1.041 ms (0.44%)

ddtrace.internal.remoteconfig.client 0.548 ms (0.23%)

ddtrace 0.658 ms (0.28%)

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-04-10 10:56:14

Comparing candidate commit 8e3b885 in PR branch avara1986/improve_iast_tests_1 with baseline commit 712dfc2 in branch main.

Found 1 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 492 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

scenario:iast_aspects-capitalize_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+77.417ns; +97.434ns] or [+7.918%; +9.965%]

scenario:iast_aspects-ospathsplitdrive_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+602.083ns; +645.638ns] or [+15.128%; +16.222%]

scenario:iast_aspects-ospathsplitext_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+594.594ns; +661.738ns] or [+11.542%; +12.845%]

scenario:iast_aspects-replace_aspect

• 🟩 execution_time [-725.454ns; -665.444ns] or [-12.218%; -11.208%]