Add publish docker backend

[gkorland]

User description

Fix #56

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Added a GitHub Actions workflow to release Docker images.

• Configured automatic tagging for Docker images based on events.

• Integrated DockerHub login and image vulnerability scanning.

• Enabled image building and pushing to DockerHub.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	release-image.yml Add workflow for Docker image release to DockerHub              .github/workflows/release-image.yml Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for Docker image release. Configured triggers for push events on tags and the main branch. Added steps for DockerHub login, image building, and vulnerability scanning. Enabled pushing Docker images to DockerHub with appropriate tags. +52/-0

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
code-graph-backend	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 24, 2025 6:28am

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gkorland has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b86a29 and 588af7b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/release-image.yml (1 hunks)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🎫 Ticket compliance analysis ✅ 56 - PR Code Verified Compliant requirements: Create a workflow to publish Docker container images Support automatic tagging based on version tags and main branch Push images to DockerHub Requires further human verification: Verify DockerHub credentials are properly configured in repository secrets Test the workflow by creating a new release tag

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 Security concerns Sensitive information handling: The workflow uses DockerHub credentials stored as secrets. While this is a good practice, ensure DOCKER_USERNAME and DOCKER_PASSWORD are properly configured as repository secrets with limited access permissions.

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Security Check The vulnerability scanner (Trivy) is using the master branch which could be unstable. Consider using a specific version tag for better reliability. uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master Build Optimization The image is built twice - once for scanning and once for pushing. Consider reusing the built image to improve workflow efficiency. - name: Build image uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 with: context: . file: ./Dockerfile push: false tags: ${{ env.TAGS }} - name: Scan image for vulnerabilities uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master with: image-ref: ${{ env.TAGS }} format: 'table' exit-code: '1' severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH' - name: Push image uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 with: context: . push: true tags: ${{ env.TAGS }}

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	✅ Pin action version for stability Suggestion Impact: Changed Trivy action version from @master to a specific version (0.29.0) to improve stability code diff: - uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master + uses: aquasecurity/[email protected] Pin the Trivy action to a specific version instead of using 'master' to ensure workflow stability and prevent unexpected breaking changes. .github/workflows/release-image.yml [40] -uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master +uses: aquasecurity/[email protected] Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Using @master for actions is a significant risk as it can lead to unexpected breaking changes. Pinning to a specific version is crucial for workflow stability and reproducibility.	9
General	Add retry for vulnerability scan Add a retry mechanism for the vulnerability scan step to handle temporary network issues or service disruptions that could cause false failures. .github/workflows/release-image.yml [39-45] - name: Scan image for vulnerabilities + uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master + continue-on-error: true + id: scan + with: + image-ref: ${{ env.TAGS }} + format: 'table' + exit-code: '1' + severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH' +- name: Retry scan on failure + if: steps.scan.outcome == 'failure' uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master with: image-ref: ${{ env.TAGS }} format: 'table' exit-code: '1' severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH' Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a retry mechanism for vulnerability scanning is crucial for CI/CD reliability, as network issues or service disruptions could cause false failures. The implementation using continue-on-error and conditional retry is well-structured.	8
	Add timeout to prevent hangs Add a timeout to the vulnerability scan step to prevent workflow hangs and excessive resource consumption. .github/workflows/release-image.yml [39-45] - name: Scan image for vulnerabilities uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master + timeout-minutes: 10 with: image-ref: ${{ env.TAGS }} format: 'table' exit-code: '1' severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH' Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a timeout is important to prevent workflow hangs and resource wastage, particularly for security scans that might take longer than expected. The 10-minute limit is reasonable for this operation.	7