Skip to content

Improve the description of rioxarray on the Ecosystem page #3686

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

seisman
Copy link
Member

@seisman seisman commented Dec 13, 2024

PyGMT relies on rioxarray in several aspect. This PR improves the description to clarify it.

Preview: https://pygmt-dev--3686.org.readthedocs.build/en/3686/ecosystem.html#rioxarray

@seisman seisman added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation skip-changelog Skip adding Pull Request to changelog needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. labels Dec 13, 2024
@seisman seisman added this to the 0.14.0 milestone Dec 13, 2024
Co-authored-by: Yvonne Fröhlich <[email protected]>
@seisman seisman changed the title Improve the description of the rioxarray on the Ecosystem page Improve the description of rioxarray on the Ecosystem page Dec 13, 2024
@seisman seisman requested a review from a team December 17, 2024 02:16
@seisman seisman added final review call This PR requires final review and approval from a second reviewer and removed needs review This PR has higher priority and needs review. labels Dec 17, 2024
@seisman seisman merged commit 05f7b09 into main Dec 18, 2024
10 checks passed
@seisman seisman deleted the doc/rioxarray branch December 18, 2024 13:21
@seisman seisman removed the final review call This PR requires final review and approval from a second reviewer label Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation skip-changelog Skip adding Pull Request to changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants