Skip to content

Modularize itoolkit.js see issue #20 #28

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 28, 2019
Merged

Modularize itoolkit.js see issue #20 #28

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 28, 2019

Conversation

abmusse
Copy link
Member

@abmusse abmusse commented Jan 28, 2019

Modularize itoolkit.js see issue #20

- Moved classes and functions into seperate modules
- Added exports to still allow access through itoolkit.js
- iConn class moved to iconn.js
- iPgm class moved to ipgm.js
- iSql class moved to isql.js
- iCmd function moved to icmd.js
- iSh function moved to ish.js
- ProgramCaller moved to programCaller.js
- xmlToJson moved to utils.js

Lint xmlToJson function

  • Note: 2 lines have ignored lint rules: 146 and 148

- Moved classes and functions into seperate modules
- Added exports to still allow access through itoolkit.js
- iConn class moved to iconn.js
- iPgm class moved to ipgm.js
- iSql class moved to isql.js
- iCmd function moved to icmd.js
- iSh function moved to ish.js
- ProgramCaller moved to programCaller.js
- xmlToJson moved to utils.js
- Note: 2 lines have igonered lint rules: 146 and 148
@abmusse abmusse mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@markdirish markdirish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for linting xmltojson and getting it all working. With this package linted and now modularized, it feels like in a much better place. Still need TLC, but it's a medium amount and not a heaping amount!

@markdirish markdirish merged commit 73dd7aa into IBM:v1.0-dev Jan 28, 2019
@markdirish markdirish mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2019
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants