Skip to content

UX of credits burning #1409

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
SCA-ZMT opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

UX of credits burning #1409

SCA-ZMT opened this issue May 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
PO issue Created by Product owners Working Group
Milestone

Comments

@SCA-ZMT
Copy link
Contributor

SCA-ZMT commented May 10, 2024

As an Uetliberg Retreat Follow-Up:

  • user experience of credits burning is negative, how to improve?
  • Lower burn rate for main app, higher burn rate for solvers?
  • Cheaper modelling-only mode?
  • Current credits gift is not enough to learn how to use S4L
### Eisbock
- [ ] https://github.com/ITISFoundation/osparc-issues/issues/1622
- [ ] https://github.com/ITISFoundation/osparc-issues/issues/1671
- [ ] https://github.com/ITISFoundation/osparc-issues/issues/1672

Working Group Lead: @eofli

### Tom Bombadil
- [ ] https://github.com/ITISFoundation/osparc-issues/issues/1552
@SCA-ZMT SCA-ZMT added this to the Leeroy Jenkins milestone May 10, 2024
@SCA-ZMT SCA-ZMT added the PO issue Created by Product owners label May 10, 2024
@SCA-ZMT SCA-ZMT added Working Group and removed PO issue Created by Product owners labels May 13, 2024
@SCA-ZMT
Copy link
Contributor Author

SCA-ZMT commented May 30, 2024

after discussion with @drniiken, adding one preliminary task:

#1474

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PO issue Created by Product owners Working Group
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants