🎨 add num_of_seats to pricing unit (for LICENSE type pricing plan)

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

Story

• Previously, we only had one type of pricing plan (CLASSIFICATION=TIER), which was used for billing running services and simulations.
• This pricing plan used a pricing unit with required extra info fields: CPU, RAM, and VRAM.
• Now, we have introduced a new type of pricing plan (CLASSIFICATION=LICENSE).
• This new pricing plan also uses pricing units, but their purpose is to store the number of seats offered. Therefore, we need the num_of_seats field in the unit’s extra info.

Highlights

• In services/web/server/src/simcore_service_webserver/licenses/_licensed_items_service.py, the new field is used to validate the body parameters sent by the frontend.
• The num_of_seats field is now passed to the frontend client. (Until now, the frontend was extracting this value from the display name.)

Related issue/s

• relates https://github.com/ITISFoundation/private-issues/issues/4
• closes The number of seats purchased is currently taken from the PricingUnitName, not good @matusdrobuliak66 @odeimaiz osparc-issues#1852

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.55046% with 43 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.93%. Comparing base (cdabc90) to head (36b41a5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7271      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.11%   86.93%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files        1685     1511     -174     
  Lines       65437    61511    -3926     
  Branches     1115      889     -226     
==========================================
- Hits        57007    53473    -3534     
+ Misses       8115     7781     -334     
+ Partials      315      257      -58     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.41% <27.90%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	85.88% <60.55%> (-0.26%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	91.54% <71.42%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	70.03% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	72.52% <0.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.46% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.56% <100.00%> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	91.73% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.25% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	98.06% <ø> (ø)
director	76.59% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.30% <100.00%> (ø)
dynamic_scheduler	97.33% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.74% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.25% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.22% <100.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
storage	84.49% <ø> (+0.24%)	⬆️
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	85.11% <63.41%> (-0.08%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cdabc90...36b41a5. Read the comment docs.

[odeimaiz]

👍

[sanderegg]

Thanks.!

[pcrespov]

thx

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud