Validation concessions options for top-level domains

[northpowered]

Added some specific args for validate_email and validate_email_domain_part methods to give an ability for validating "bad" TLD in email addresses. Full description was added in README

• allow_special_domains=False - ignore restrictions for SPECIAL_USE domains
• allow_any_top_level_domain=False - ignore regex constraints for a TLD
• allowed_top_level_domains=[] - whitelist for TLD, not matching regex from previous option

All tests passed

Default values were set such as False for saving the original validation logic without slowdown

[JoshData]

Thanks. I feel strongly about not having an option to completely disable the special use domains check: It should not be easy to have non-deliverable addresses pass validation. Is modifying the global SPECIAL_USE_DOMAIN_NAMES list not helpful for your use case?

[northpowered]

Thanks. I feel strongly about not having an option to completely disable the special use domains check: It should not be easy to have non-deliverable addresses pass validation. Is modifying the global SPECIAL_USE_DOMAIN_NAMES list not helpful for your use case?

Yep, maybe I can do smth like
global SPECIAL_USE_DOMAIN_NAMES
but I`m voting also for an availability to use any domain, if developer want it :D

[JoshData]

I`m voting also for an availability to use any domain, if developer want it :D

This isn't a democracy. :) My goal is to make a good library. It's not to solve any problem that anyone happens to post here.

If you can describe why you want these things, it can shape my thinking about what makes a good library for the purpose here.

[northpowered]

I`m voting also for an availability to use any domain, if developer want it :D

This isn't a democracy. :) My goal is to make a good library. It's not to solve any problem that anyone happens to post here.

If you can describe why you want these things, it can shape my thinking about what makes a good library for the purpose here.

No problems. I made some utils for a legacy private infrastructure with TLD like foo123 and local. Yeah, I`s so surprised to see non-RFC TLD, but decided to do something :)
Also maybe I should push this changes to my fork and publish the lib with the different name? I planned to use it EmailStr in Pydantic

[JoshData]

On the dev branch in 1d2e4b2 I added an option globally_deliverable which when set to False will skip some of the checks you wanted to disable. That plus clearing SPECIAL_USE_DOMAIN_NAMES should get you what you were looking for. What do you think?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #86 (1d2e4b2) into main (65b2744) will increase coverage by 1.52%.
The diff coverage is 76.19%.

❗ Current head 1d2e4b2 differs from pull request most recent head dace4e7. Consider uploading reports for the commit dace4e7 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #86      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.90%   85.43%   +1.52%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         261      302      +41     
==========================================
+ Hits          219      258      +39     
- Misses         42       44       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
email_validator/__init__.py	85.43% <76.19%> (+1.52%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[northpowered]

Yep, that's good! This globally_deliverable option ignore period and regex checks in TLD, but this patch isn't clearing SPECIAL_USE_DOMAIN_NAMES as you said before :-)
To clear this check I recommend to move block

    for d in SPECIAL_USE_DOMAIN_NAMES:
        # See the note near the definition of SPECIAL_USE_DOMAIN_NAMES.
        if d == "test" and test_environment:
            continue

        if ascii_domain == d or ascii_domain.endswith("." + d):
            raise EmailSyntaxError("The domain name %s is a special-use or reserved name that cannot be used with email." % domain_i18n)

under the if globally_deliverable: (line 556 in the dev branch)

I hope I'll able to add globally_deliverable option to Pydantic email validator in the nearest future :-)