Skip to content

Rename _device_type to _accelerator_type #11326

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

kaushikb11
Copy link
Contributor

@kaushikb11 kaushikb11 commented Jan 5, 2022

What does this PR do?

Part of #9932

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

cc @Borda @justusschock @awaelchli @akihironitta @rohitgr7

@awaelchli
Copy link
Contributor

@four4fish A deprecation is not needed, as the attribute is not public. #11002 and this PR do not block each other as best as I can tell.

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ def setup(self, trainer: "pl.Trainer", pl_module: "pl.LightningModule", stage: O
if not trainer.logger:
raise MisconfigurationException("Cannot use GPUStatsMonitor callback with Trainer that has no logger.")

if trainer._device_type != _AcceleratorType.GPU:
if trainer._accelerator_type != _AcceleratorType.GPU:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(for a separate issue/PR) i know this is a rename, but why do we need this check at all? couldn't we use the strategy's root_device instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or strategy's on_gpu property. Could be a follow up.

@mergify mergify bot added the ready PRs ready to be merged label Jan 5, 2022
@kaushikb11
Copy link
Contributor Author

Need some refactoring for accelerator_connector. Converting to Draft.

@kaushikb11 kaushikb11 marked this pull request as draft January 6, 2022 05:57
@awaelchli awaelchli mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2022
11 tasks
@Borda Borda deleted the rename/device_accelerator_type branch March 29, 2022 05:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accelerator ready PRs ready to be merged refactor
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants