Skip to content

base: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment #43

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
NavidSassan opened this issue Jan 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

base: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment #43

NavidSassan opened this issue Jan 3, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
@markuslf
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@NavidSassan
Copy link
Member

In GitLab by @markuslf on Jan 3, 2022, 10:42

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/starface-backup-status", line 220, in 'module'
    main()
  File "/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/starface-backup-status", line 158, in main
    data = lib.base2.coe(lib.net2.fetch(args.HOSTNAME, args.PORT, timeout=args.TIMEOUT))
  File "/usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/lib/base2.py", line 145, in coe
    result[1] = result[1].decode(codec)
TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment
@NavidSassan
Copy link
Member Author

In GitLab by @markuslf on Jan 3, 2022, 10:44

mentioned in commit 9237bc7

@NavidSassan
Copy link
Member Author

In GitLab by @markuslf on Jan 3, 2022, 10:46

mentioned in issue monitoring-plugins#492

@NavidSassan
Copy link
Member Author

mentioned in commit 4538120

NavidSassan added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2022
@NavidSassan
Merge branch 'develop' into 'master'
4538120 
new release

Closes #30, #40, #41, #43, #44, #42, #46, #45, #47, #49, #50, #52, #51, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #59, #60, #61, and #62

See merge request linuxfabrik/lib!9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@markuslf markuslf

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@markuslf @NavidSassan