Skip to content

clarifying the limitation around dataflows gen1 #1712

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dgosbell
Copy link

@KesemSharabi As per this article https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-factory/dataflow-gen2-migrate-from-dataflow-gen1 dataflows gen1 can work in a multi-geo configuration if the storage is setup to use a container in the same region as the multi-geo capacity

Thank you for contributing to Microsoft Fabric documentation

Fill out these items before submitting your pull request:

If you are working internally at Microsoft:
Provide a link to an Azure DevOps Boards work item that tracks this feature/update.

Who is your primary Skilling team contact? @mention them individually tag them and let them review the PR before signing off.

For internal Microsoft contributors, check off these quality control items as you go

  • 1. Check the Acrolinx report: Make sure your Acrolinx Total score is above 80 minimum (higher is better) and with no spelling issues. Acrolinx ensures we are providing consistent terminology and using an appropriate voice and tone, and helps with localization.

  • 2. Successful build with no warnings or suggestions: Review the build status to make sure all files are green (Succeeded).

  • 3. Preview the pages:: Click each Preview URL link to view the rendered HTML pages on the review.learn.microsoft.com site to check the formatting and alignment of the page. Scan the page for overall formatting, and look at the parts you edited in detail.

  • 4. Check the Table of Contents: If you are adding a new markdown file, make sure it is linked from the table of contents.

  • 5. #sign-off to request PR review and merge: Once the pull request is finalized and ready to be merged, indicate so by typing #sign-off in a new comment in the Pull Request. If you need to cancel that sign-off, type #hold-off instead. Signing off means the document can be published at any time. Note, this is a formatting and standards review, not a technical review.

Merge and publish

  • After you #sign-off, there is a separate PR Review team that will review the PR and describe any necessary feedback before merging.
  • The review team will use the comments section in the PR to provide feedback if changes are needed. Address any blocking issues and sign off again to request another review.
  • Once all feedback is resolved, you can #sign-off again. The PR Review team reviews and merges the pull request into the specified branch (usually the main branch or a release- branch).
  • From the main branch, the change is merged into the live branch several times a day to publish it to the public learn.microsoft.com site.

As per this article https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-factory/dataflow-gen2-migrate-from-dataflow-gen1 dataflows gen1 can work in a multi-geo configuration if the storage is setup to use a container in the same region as the multi-geo capacity
Copy link
Contributor

@dgosbell : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 6dc3c01:

⚠️ Validation status: warnings

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/admin/service-admin-premium-multi-geo.md ⚠️Warning Details

docs/admin/service-admin-premium-multi-geo.md

  • Line 128, Column 156: [Warning: file-not-found - See documentation] Invalid file link: '(/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-azure-data-lake-storage-integration)'.

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Your PR may contain errors or warnings or suggestions unrelated to the files you changed. This happens when external dependencies like GitHub alias, Microsoft alias, cross repo links are updated. Please use these instructions to resolve them.

For any questions, please:

@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Large-storage format semantic models shouldn't be moved from the region where th

* Detailed semantic model metadata lives in the home tenant.

* The [dataflows](/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-introduction-self-service) feature isn't supported on Multi-Geo.
* To use [dataflows gen1](/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-introduction-self-service) on Multi-Geo you must configure dataflow storage to use [Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS) Gen2]((/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-azure-data-lake-storage-integration)).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* To use [dataflows gen1](/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-introduction-self-service) on Multi-Geo you must configure dataflow storage to use [Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS) Gen2]((/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-azure-data-lake-storage-integration)).
* To use [dataflows gen1](/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-introduction-self-service) on Multi-Geo you must configure dataflow storage to use [Azure Data Lake Storage (ADLS) Gen2](/power-bi/transform-model/dataflows/dataflows-azure-data-lake-storage-integration).

@Court72
Copy link
Contributor

Court72 commented Apr 11, 2025

@KesemSharabi

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

Copy link
Contributor

@dgosbell : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants