Fixed the webhook example

[christianfds]

Fixes #2430

Signed-off-by: Christian Franchin dos Santos [email protected]

[Polo2]

I'm not sure webhook example has to be fixed by removing /paths, since it's specified for version 3.1:

The OpenAPI document MUST contain at least one paths field, a components field or a webhooks field

A documentation may include both paths and webhooks, ad it's done in this example. WDYT ?

[Polo2]

I'm not sure webhook example has to be fixed by removing /paths, since it's specified for version 3.1:

The OpenAPI document MUST contain at least one paths field, a components field or a webhooks field

A documentation may include both paths and webhooks, ad it's done in this example. WDYT ?

Ooops, my bad, I should have read related issue #2430 before adding this comment... 🙏 Sorry!
Indeed, a webhook example with only webhooks , and not extra paths could help to understand this new feature

[darrelmiller]

@christianfds Thank you for your contribution. Much appreciated.