New Components - lucca #16154
New Components - lucca #16154
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces multiple new modules and enhancements for the Lucca integration. New action modules for approving leave requests and updating user information have been added, along with several event source modules for new leave requests, new expense reports, and new user creations. Enhancements include new constants, additional properties in the app configuration, and a suite of supporting methods for API interaction and event emission. Package version and dependency updates are also included. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor Client
participant ApproveAction as ApproveLeaveRequestAction
participant LuccaApp as LuccaApp API
Client->>ApproveAction: Call run(context) with leaveRequestId, approved, comment
ApproveAction->>LuccaApp: approveLeaveRequest(leaveRequestId, {approved, comment})
LuccaApp-->>ApproveAction: API Response
ApproveAction-->>Client: Return summary and API response
sequenceDiagram
participant Source as NewLeaveRequestSource
participant Base as CommonBaseModule
participant LuccaApp as LuccaApp API
participant DB as Database
Source->>Base: run() to emit events
Base->>DB: _getLastId()
Base->>LuccaApp: listLeaveRequests() call
LuccaApp-->>Base: Return leave requests
Base->>DB: _setLastId(newLastId)
Base-->>Source: Emit new leave request events with summary
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/lucca/actions/update-user-info/update-user-info.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/lucca/lucca.app.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Sources - New Leave Request - New User - New Expense Report Actions - Approve Leave Request - Update User Info
components/lucca/sources/new-expense-report/new-expense-report.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
components/lucca/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-1: Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this constant.The
LIMITconstant is exported without any documentation about its purpose or where it's used. Adding a brief comment would help other developers understand its significance in the Lucca integration.+// Maximum number of items to retrieve per API request export const LIMIT = 100;components/lucca/actions/approve-leave-request/approve-leave-request.mjs (1)
30-42: Consider handling errors explicitly in the run method.While the current implementation will naturally throw errors when the API call fails, adding explicit error handling would improve the user experience by providing more context.
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.lucca.approveLeaveRequest({ - $, - leaveRequestId: this.leaveRequestId, - data: { - approved: this.approved, - comment: this.comment, - }, - }); - - $.export("$summary", `Leave request ${this.leaveRequestId} was successfully processed.`); - return response; + try { + const response = await this.lucca.approveLeaveRequest({ + $, + leaveRequestId: this.leaveRequestId, + data: { + approved: this.approved, + comment: this.comment, + }, + }); + + $.export("$summary", `Leave request ${this.leaveRequestId} was successfully ${this.approved ? 'approved' : 'denied'}.`); + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to process leave request: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },components/lucca/sources/new-user/test-event.mjs (1)
1-67: Sample event structure is well-defined but has some inconsistencies.The test event provides a comprehensive structure for a user object, which is good for testing and documentation. However, there are a few inconsistencies to note:
- The casing convention is inconsistent - most properties use camelCase, but
userWorkCycleshas PascalCase properties (Id,OwnerID, etc.)- The
pictureobject useshrefwhile other objects useurlfor similar purposes- Generic placeholders like
"<string>"could be replaced with more realistic sample dataConsider standardizing the casing convention across all properties and using more realistic sample data to improve the usefulness of this test event.
components/lucca/sources/new-user/new-user.mjs (1)
17-19: Consider enhancing the user summary with more identifiable information.The current summary only includes the user's name, but in enterprise environments, it might be helpful to include additional identifying information like email or employee ID.
Consider enhancing the summary to include more identifiable information:
getSummary(item) { - return `New User: ${item.name}`; + return `New User: ${item.name}${item.employeeNumber ? ` (ID: ${item.employeeNumber})` : ''}`; },components/lucca/sources/new-leave-request/new-leave-request.mjs (1)
17-19: Consider enhancing leave request summary with more context.The current summary only includes the leave request ID, which isn't very descriptive for users. Including information about the requester or date range would make the notification more useful.
Consider enhancing the summary to include more context about the leave request:
getSummary(item) { - return `New Leave Request with ID: ${item.id}`; + return `New Leave Request with ID: ${item.id}${item.leavePeriod?.ownerName ? ` from ${item.leavePeriod.ownerName}` : ''}`; },components/lucca/sources/new-expense-report/new-expense-report.mjs (1)
17-19: Consider enhancing expense report summary with additional context.The current summary only includes the expense report name. Adding information about the amount or creator would make the notification more useful for workflow automation.
Consider enhancing the summary to include more context about the expense report:
getSummary(item) { - return `New expense report: ${item.name}`; + return `New expense report: ${item.name}${item.ownerName ? ` from ${item.ownerName}` : ''}`; },components/lucca/sources/new-expense-report/test-event.mjs (3)
1-49: Consider clarifying placeholder fields.
Some fields have placeholder values like"<string>"or"<any>". While this might be sufficient for demonstrative or testing purposes, consider replacing them with real or more descriptive placeholder data to avoid confusion and ensure that consumers understand the expected data format.
50-131: Ensure attendee data reflects real-world scenarios.
Theattendees.internalandattendees.externalarrays are comprehensive, but some fields (e.g.,birthDate,lastName, etc.) are all placeholders. If this test event is used for integration or acceptance testing, consider providing realistic or reproducible data to better mimic actual user data.
132-181: Consider storing large sample data separately.
This module exports an extensive object for demonstration. If this data grows over time or is reused in multiple places, you might separate it into a JSON fixture or a shared constant for maintainability.components/lucca/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
39-53: Potential concurrency concerns.
If this source can run concurrently (e.g., multiple instances or short intervals), storing the last ID in this way might risk overwriting. A potential solution is to use a locking mechanism or a distributed store with version checks. However, if concurrency is not a concern in your environment, this is fine as is.components/lucca/actions/update-user-info/update-user-info.mjs (2)
3-16: Uniformly apply async options for ID props.
You've already usedpropDefinitionwith async options foruserId. Consider consistently applying a similar approach for other ID fields (e.g.,managerId) so that users can conveniently look up valid IDs without manually typing them.
17-157: Validate data for complex fields.
Properties likebirthDateandbirthDateis in"YYYY-MM-DD"). This can prevent unexpected backend errors.components/lucca/lucca.app.mjs (2)
7-43: Check performance for large datasets.
When listing users or leave requests, you fetch with apagingparam. For organizations with a very large user base, scrolling or searching could be slow or incomplete. Consider adding filtering or search parameters, or providing a descriptive label for each user if needed.Would you like help adding more advanced search or filtering logic to your options?
158-182: Handle emptyitems.
In thepaginatemethod, the code destructuresitemsfrom the response without additional null checks. If the API returns an unexpected payload withoutitems, this could throw an error. Consider adding either a fallback or a short-circuit check.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
components/lucca/actions/approve-leave-request/approve-leave-request.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/actions/update-user-info/update-user-info.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/lucca.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/package.json(2 hunks)components/lucca/sources/common/base.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/sources/new-expense-report/new-expense-report.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/sources/new-expense-report/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/sources/new-leave-request/new-leave-request.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/sources/new-leave-request/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/sources/new-user/new-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/sources/new-user/test-event.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/lucca/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump and dependencies look appropriate.The version update from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 reflects the significant additions to the Lucca integration. The addition of the @pipedream/platform dependency is also appropriate for a Pipedream component.
Also applies to: 14-17
components/lucca/sources/new-leave-request/test-event.mjs (1)
1-50: LGTM! Well-structured test event for leave request.The test event provides a comprehensive example of a leave request structure with all necessary fields for testing. The placeholder values are appropriate for sample data.
components/lucca/actions/approve-leave-request/approve-leave-request.mjs (1)
3-43: LGTM! Well-implemented action for approving/denying leave requests.The action is well-structured with clear props and follows Pipedream's component patterns. The documentation link and export summary provide good context for users.
components/lucca/sources/new-user/new-user.mjs (1)
4-22: Well-structured source component with good documentation.The component follows the established pattern for source components, extending the common base module and properly defining the required configuration. The inclusion of documentation link in the description is helpful for developers.
components/lucca/sources/new-leave-request/new-leave-request.mjs (1)
4-22: Well-structured source component with proper documentation link.The component follows the established pattern for source components, extending the common base module and properly defining the required configuration.
components/lucca/sources/new-expense-report/new-expense-report.mjs (1)
4-22: Well-structured source component with appropriate documentation link.The component follows the established pattern for source components, extending the common base module and properly defining the required configuration. The documentation link in the description is valuable for developers.
components/lucca/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
22-38:❓ Verification inconclusive
Validate item ordering in the API response.
Here, the code breaks out of the loop once it encounters anitem.id <= lastId. This assumes the items are sorted strictly in descending order by ID. Verify that the API reliably provides items in descending order; otherwise, some newer items might get missed.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # This script verifies that the API returns descending IDs in the getFunction() call. # We'll look for a sorting param or relevant docs in the codebase. rg -A 10 'orderBy:'Length of output: 63877
Action Required: Confirm API's Descending Sort Behavior
- The code in
components/lucca/sources/common/base.mjsexplicitly setsorderBy: "id,desc"when calling the paginate method. This indicates an expectation that the API returns items in descending order by their ID.- The loop logic (
if (item.id <= lastId) break;) relies on this ordering to avoid processing items with previously seen IDs.- Please verify that the Lucca API reliably honors the
orderBy: "id,desc"parameter so that no new items are inadvertently skipped. If there's any doubt, consider adding tests or safeguards to ensure consistent ordering.components/lucca/lucca.app.mjs (1)
133-141:✅ Verification successful
Confirm request method for approvals.
TheapproveLeaveRequestmethod uses aPOSTrequest to"/leaveRequests/{leaveRequestId}/approvals". Ensure indeed that the Lucca API expects aPOSTfor this route instead ofPATCH,PUT, or another HTTP verb.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Checking code and doc references to confirm the correct method for leaveRequests approvals rg -A 5 'leaveRequests'Length of output: 1523
Action: Confirmed POST method for approvals endpoint
The
approveLeaveRequestmethod consistently uses aPOSTrequest for the/leaveRequests/{leaveRequestId}/approvalsendpoint, and our grep search shows no alternative HTTP methods (such asPATCHorPUT) being used for this route. This suggests that the Lucca API expects aPOSTfor leave approvals. However, if there’s any uncertainty, please cross-check with the official Lucca API documentation.
- Verified usage in
components/lucca/lucca.app.mjs(lines 133-141).- No conflicting HTTP verbs were detected in related code sections.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/lucca/actions/update-user-info/update-user-info.mjs (1)
4-122: Consider converting additional ID props to use async options
Props likecalendarIdremain simple integers. If the Lucca API supports listing possible calendar IDs, you could implement an async options pattern, similar touserIdorlegalEntityId, to guide users with valid choices and reduce input errors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/lucca/actions/update-user-info/update-user-info.mjs(1 hunks)components/lucca/lucca.app.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/lucca/actions/update-user-info/update-user-info.mjs (2)
1-3: Imports look good
No issues here.
123-139:✅ Verification successful
Looks solid—verify references to ensure consistent usage
The data is destructured and sent as a single object toupdateUserProfile, which is fine. Double-check that upstream code sets these props correctly.Here's a script to locate references to
update-user-infoorupdateUserProfileacross the codebase, checking for consistent usage:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash rg -A 5 "update-user-info" rg -A 5 "updateUserProfile"Length of output: 1545
Verified: Consistent Usage of
updateUserProfileReferencesThe code in
components/lucca/actions/update-user-info/update-user-info.mjscorrectly destructures the properties and passes them as a single object tolucca.updateUserProfile. Our reference search confirms that:
- The action file sets the relevant properties (
$, userId, ...data) consistently.- The upstream implementation in
components/lucca/lucca.app.mjsappropriately receives{ userId, ...opts }and constructs the request as expected.Everything aligns with the intended usage. Please ensure that all upstream modules maintain these prop settings.
components/lucca/lucca.app.mjs (3)
1-3: Import statements align with dependencies
No concerns here—axios usage is appropriate for requests.
7-98: Proactive use of async options
Listing items foruserId,leaveRequestId,legalEntityId,departmentId, andnationalityIdhelps users avoid input mistakes. This structure is clear and user-friendly.
177-202: Clean and straightforward pagination implementation
Your do-while loop and limiting logic appear correct. Good approach in returning early oncemaxResultsis reached.
|
/approve |
Resolves #16101.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores