interactions of elements csharp code added in github

[pallavigitwork]

User description

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

interactions of elements csharp code added in github

Motivation and Context

code was not on github and current displayed wasn't correct

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

---

PR Type

enhancement, documentation

---

Description

• Added a new test method TestInteractionCommands in InteractionTest.cs to demonstrate various web element interactions using ChromeDriver.
• Included assertions to validate the state of web elements after interactions.
• Updated English, Japanese, Portuguese, and Chinese documentation to include new CSharp code examples.
• Removed outdated CSharp code snippets from documentation.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	InteractionTest.cs Add comprehensive interaction tests for web elements          examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs Added a new test method TestInteractionCommands for various interactions like click, send keys, and clear. Utilized ChromeDriver for browser operations. Added assertions to verify the behavior of web elements. Browser is properly closed after test execution. +44/-1
Documentation	interactions.en.md Update English documentation with new CSharp code examples website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.en.md Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests. Removed outdated CSharp code snippets. +13/-29  interactions.ja.md Update Japanese documentation with new CSharp code examples website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.ja.md Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests. Removed outdated CSharp code snippets. +12/-30  interactions.pt-br.md Update Portuguese documentation with new CSharp code examples website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.pt-br.md Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests. Removed outdated CSharp code snippets. +9/-29    interactions.zh-cn.md Update Chinese documentation with new CSharp code examples website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.zh-cn.md Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests. Removed outdated CSharp code snippets. +11/-30

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	48dc102

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Description updated to latest commit (58baaf7)

• Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the PR involves a moderate amount of new code primarily focused on adding new test methods and updating documentation. The changes are straightforward and localized to specific files, making the review process less complex.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The assertion Assert.AreEqual(isChecked, false); in the TestInteractionCommands method assumes the checkbox is initially unchecked. If the default state changes or varies, this test could fail. Consider adding a setup step to ensure the checkbox state.
	Code Quality: The repeated pattern of finding an element, performing an action, and then verifying could be refactored into helper methods to improve code readability and reusability.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Replace implicit waits with explicit waits for better test reliability Replace the use of implicit waits with explicit waits to improve the robustness of the test. Implicit waits can lead to unpredictable wait times and make the tests flaky. Explicit waits are more flexible and can wait for specific conditions. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [15] -driver.Manage().Timeouts().ImplicitWait = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500); +WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)); +wait.Until(drv => drv.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input")).Displayed); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the use of implicit waits and proposes a switch to explicit waits, which is a best practice in Selenium testing for more predictable and reliable test outcomes.	8
Robustness	Add exception handling to WebDriver interactions to manage runtime errors Add exception handling around the WebDriver interactions to gracefully handle possible runtime errors such as elements not being found or not being clickable. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [20-21] -IWebElement checkInput = driver.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input")); -checkInput.Click(); +try +{ + IWebElement checkInput = driver.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input")); + checkInput.Click(); +} +catch (NoSuchElementException ex) +{ + Console.WriteLine("Element not found: " + ex.Message); +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding exception handling around WebDriver interactions is a good practice to make the tests more robust by handling runtime errors gracefully. The suggestion is relevant and improves the code's robustness.	7
Maintainability	Ensure the browser is always closed by using a finally block Ensure the browser is quit even if the test fails by placing driver.Quit() in a finally block. This prevents browser windows from hanging open if there are errors during test execution. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [49] -driver.Quit(); +try +{ + // Test commands +} +finally +{ + driver.Quit(); +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Placing driver.Quit() inside a finally block ensures that the browser is closed even if the test fails, which is crucial for preventing resource leaks and maintaining clean test environments. This is a valuable suggestion for better resource management.	7
Readability	Use boolean-specific assertions for clarity Use Assert.IsTrue or Assert.IsFalse for boolean conditions to make the assertions more readable and intention-revealing. examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [25] -Assert.AreEqual(isChecked, false); +Assert.IsFalse(isChecked); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to use Assert.IsFalse instead of Assert.AreEqual for boolean conditions enhances readability and makes the intention clearer, which is a good improvement for code clarity.	6

[harsha509]

Thank you @pallavigitwork !

[pallavigitwork]

Thank you @harsha509 :)