Skip to content

start translation #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

start translation #60

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

marsprince
Copy link

开始干苦力

@numbbbbb numbbbbb closed this Jun 10, 2014
chenranj pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Most of these runs of blank lines were added as a byproduct of the
RST-to-markdown export. In a few places, these were an intentional part
of authoring — for example, most of the reference has two blank lines
before a section heading — which we could put back if desired. I think
there is an argument to be made for the consistency of single blank
lines, from an authoring perspective. I don't remember the full
rationale from 2014 when Brian and I used the double blanks in the
reference.

Verified changes are only in blank lines with `git diff
--ignore-blank-lines`, which has no output. Also confirmed that there
are no changes in the HTML output from DocC.
chenranj pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Change some places that got didn't get fixed by PR #60 and PR #50.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants