Skip to content

fix: Comments feedback & flaky test #1481

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

fix: Comments feedback & flaky test #1481

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

matthewlipski
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR addresses the remaining feedback from #1376

Also fixes an e2e test that was temporarily bypassed because it was flaky

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 4, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
blocknote ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 4, 2025 11:56am
blocknote-website ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 4, 2025 11:56am

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
"scripts": {
"build": "tsc",
"lint": "eslint src --max-warnings 0",
"playwright": "npx playwright test",
"playwright": "npx playwright test --ui",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably not intentional

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is actually! Since we really only use this command to check why an individual test is failing, I figured we may as well add the --ui flag to make this easier. I would previously set --headed instead, but --ui is much nicer.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, well then the playwright:ui task is redudant then

Copy link
Contributor

@nperez0111 nperez0111 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise gtg

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants