Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix SWC support with stage 3 decorators #2136

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MuTsunTsai
Copy link

Since TypeScript 5.0, stage 3 decorators had become the default while experimentalDecorators had become the legacy standard. However, with SWC enabled, ts-node doesn't work correctly with stage 3 decorators. This PR fixes the config pass to SWC to make it things work as it should.

Note: This part of the SWC config has been there since v1.3.47, so there's no need the change the dependency specifications.

dynamicImport: true,
importAssertions: true,
} as swcWasm.TsParserConfig,
target: swcTarget as swcWasm.JscTarget,
transform: {
decoratorMetadata: emitDecoratorMetadata,
legacyDecorator: true,
legacyDecorator: experimentalDecorators,
decoratorVersion: experimentalDecorators ? '2021-12' : '2022-03',

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
decoratorVersion: experimentalDecorators ? '2021-12' : '2022-03',
decoratorVersion: experimentalDecorators ? '2021-12' : '2023-11',

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where did you get that 2023-11 from? SWC doesn't have that option: https://swc.rs/docs/configuration/compilation#jsctransformdecoratorversion

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where did you get that 2023-11 from? SWC doesn't have that option: https://swc.rs/docs/configuration/compilation#jsctransformdecoratorversion

I saw this value in SWC error message & Babel document, maybe it hasn't been implemented.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants