-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 446
fix: client not approved timeout exception #2466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
NoelStephensUnity
wants to merge
9
commits into
develop
from
fix/client-not-approved-timeout-exception
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
522efe0
fix
NoelStephensUnity eaa2095
test
NoelStephensUnity e45ac37
update
NoelStephensUnity 8f851f0
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/client-not-approved-timeout-exception
NoelStephensUnity a0288e4
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/client-not-approved-timeout-exception
NoelStephensUnity f4bfc54
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/client-not-approved-timeout-exception
NoelStephensUnity c84ac82
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/client-not-approved-timeout-exception
0xFA11 f862a5a
Merge develop into fix/client-not-approved-timeout-exception
netcode-ci-service cff6d24
Merge branch 'develop' into fix/client-not-approved-timeout-exception
0xFA11 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First, I'd like to quote your (@NoelStephensUnity) comment inline here (for the discussion):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also quoting an exception from the linked issue (#2389):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should not change the behavior here — the minimum fix is to simply handle
NM.DisconnectClient()
call gracefully and leave other issues/exceptions related to transport, including 3rd-party ones, up their own implementation.As a rule of thumb, a transport should be able to handle a disconnect or a send message call to an unknown or "just-removed" connection gracefully.
Perhaps this would give the general idea:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, not sure why I approached it this way.
Fixing the transport id mapping is indeed a less intrusive fix for the issue.