-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
RFC: Specify a license for vulnerablecode Data #277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@pombredanne Regarding the overly complex aspect of the cdla-permissive-1.0 license text that you were concerned about, I did a quick comparison between the texts of it and cc-by-4.0, and discovered that the amount text in cdla-permissive-1.0 is roughly 60% of the amount of text in cc-by-4.0. So maybe one is still easier to read and understand than the other, but cc-by-4.0 is definitely way more verbose. As before, I see it as a coin toss, and if you still prefer cc-by-4.0, that's ok with me. |
@pombredanne I did find, I think, a substantive difference between the two licenses.
whereas the other license has
Which tells me that if we want to prevent any sublicensing (and I'm not at all sure if we do, and have no opinion on that) then we might want to use cc-by-4.0; otherwise, the cdla-permissive-1.0 is less restricted and more "free" with the main emphasis being on attribution. |
@DennisClark Thank you ++ Some extra considerations as we are integrating other data:
So our license would be IMHO for:
|
Here is what I think makes the most sense:
|
Old notice is :
Here is the proposed new notice with the CC-BY-4.0 license:
|
@sbs2001 @Hritik14 @tardyp @haikoschol @kartiksibal @rolfschr @tushar912 ping! Any feedback? |
Actually since we have data that is CC-BY-SA the minimal shared common denominator for the data is going to be CC-BY-SA and not CC-BY. |
For background, Alpine, gentoo, victims, Alma and vulncode among others are using the CC-BY-SA license for their data. So I am going to apply this to the code:
And have this in the top level notice:
And this in the UI:
|
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
This is the combined Apache and CC-BY-SA notice Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
This has been merged. |
We need to specify a license for vulnerablecode Data. Workable candidates include:
cdla-permissive-1.0
https://cdla.io/permissive-1-0/
https://spdx.org/licenses/CDLA-Permissive-1.0.html
and
cc-by-4.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-4.0.html
Both licenses are also in the scancode list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: