You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 29, 2019. It is now read-only.
This is a feature request to allow more flexibility in the monthpicker. Currently its set to always be 3x4. In my custom template I'd like to have this as 4x3. The monthpicker is currently hardcoded to split by 3:
scope.rows = this.split(months, 3);
This is similar to this request for yearpicker: #4970#3348 but different in that we can only have 12 months so I propose just providing a monthsPerRow option which defaults to the current 3 if not provided.
Happy to submit a PR for this if you are happy to take this in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This sounds reasonable, similar to how the yearpicker works - feel free to file a PR. Be aware that current master has some major changes in the datepicker config definition (deprecating most attribute bindings).
This is a feature request to allow more flexibility in the monthpicker. Currently its set to always be 3x4. In my custom template I'd like to have this as 4x3. The monthpicker is currently hardcoded to split by 3:
scope.rows = this.split(months, 3);
This is similar to this request for yearpicker: #4970 #3348 but different in that we can only have 12 months so I propose just providing a monthsPerRow option which defaults to the current 3 if not provided.
Happy to submit a PR for this if you are happy to take this in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: