-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Added documentation #26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | ||
defmodule Tensorflex.Graph do | ||
|
||
@moduledoc false | ||
|
||
defstruct [:def, :name] | ||
|
||
end |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | ||
defmodule Tensorflex.Matrix do | ||
|
||
@moduledoc false | ||
|
||
defstruct [:nrows, :ncols, :data] | ||
|
||
end |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ | ||
defmodule Tensorflex.NIFs do | ||
@moduledoc false | ||
|
||
@on_load :load_nifs | ||
|
||
def load_nifs do | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | ||
defmodule Tensorflex.Tensor do | ||
|
||
@moduledoc false | ||
|
||
defstruct [:datatype, :tensor] | ||
|
||
end |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe this should be public given that we return it in many examples?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that might be counter-intuitive. Since the structs mainly handle the NIF references, I don't think it would be appropriate for users to know about the internal working of the Tensorflex structs. Adding docs for the internal structs might make users think that they can also modify/work with them. Plus there is no code to really document, just the reference wrapping struct.
This is my take on it. What do you think?
PS: I'm merging this PR for now, but in case you think that we should have docs for the structs, I will put in a new PR for them
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the best is to implement Inspect protocol for this to return something opaque. Something like this after the module definition:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be the best thing to do. I'll add this code to all these side modules in the next PR. Thank you!