Skip to content

Feat: add operator internal name alias for operator Python modules #2168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 19, 2025

Conversation

PProfizi
Copy link
Contributor

@PProfizi PProfizi commented Mar 18, 2025

This allows retro-compatibility of changes in internal names associated to a particular scripting name.
Solves #1438

FYI @oparreno

@PProfizi PProfizi added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 18, 2025
@PProfizi PProfizi requested a review from rafacanton March 18, 2025 13:59
@PProfizi PProfizi self-assigned this Mar 18, 2025
@PProfizi PProfizi added this to the 0.13.7 milestone Mar 18, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.02%. Comparing base (7917c7b) to head (64e4e0a).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2168   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.02%   84.02%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines       10303    10303           
=======================================
  Hits         8657     8657           
  Misses       1646     1646           

@PProfizi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Release pipeline with modifications

@PProfizi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Release pipeline

@PProfizi PProfizi merged commit 68f0755 into master Mar 19, 2025
46 checks passed
@PProfizi PProfizi deleted the feat/add_operator_alias branch March 19, 2025 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants