-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
linstor: fix template copy on non hyperconverged setups #8114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
linstor: fix template copy on non hyperconverged setups #8114
Conversation
Making a diskful resource was meant as an optimization, but cannot work on non hyperconverged setups, as the storage nodes (diskful) are not part of the cloudstack cluster.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clgtm
should this go in 4.18.2/4.19 @rp- ? |
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a [SF] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
yes, in both if my mentioned commit was also merged in 4.19. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.18 #8114 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 13.07% 13.07% -0.01%
Complexity 9110 9110
============================================
Files 2720 2720
Lines 257526 257533 +7
Branches 40150 40150
============================================
Hits 33661 33661
- Misses 219636 219643 +7
Partials 4229 4229
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 7423 |
@blueorangutan test |
@DaanHoogland a [LL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[LL]Trillian test result (tid-6857)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code LGTM
@rp- is this good to merge? |
yes |
Making a diskful resource was meant as an optimization, but cannot work on non hyperconverged setups, as the storage nodes (diskful) are not part of the cloudstack cluster. (cherry picked from commit 67cb9b9) Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <[email protected]>
Making a diskful resource was meant as an optimization, but cannot work on non hyperconverged setups, as the storage nodes (diskful) are not part of the cloudstack cluster. (cherry picked from commit 67cb9b9) Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <[email protected]>
Making a diskful resource was meant as an optimization, but cannot work on non hyperconverged setups, as the storage nodes (diskful) are not part of the cloudstack cluster.
Description
Making a diskful resource was meant as an optimization, but cannot work on non hyperconverged setups,
as the storage nodes (diskful) are not part of the cloudstack cluster.
This was introduced with 4a86a0d, so it isn't in any released version yet.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
Tested on a new non hyperconverged cluster setup
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?