Introduce StringEncoder and StringDecoder types #44
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
A sibling PR to #41, as part of moving from hand-crafted code that uses
LosslessStringConvertible
conformances on built-in and generated types, we need not just an URI coder, but also a raw string coder.This will be used for encoding and decoding
text/plain
bodies, where only primitive types can be used, and are encoded as raw strings.Modifications
Introduced two types,
StringEncoder
andStringDecoder
. It's very simple, doesn't support containers, only primitive types.Result
Once this lands, it'll allow us to get rid of our ugly marker protocols
_StringConvertible
and_AutoLosslessStringConvertible
and always go throughCodable
. More on this in subsequent PRs integrating this logic.Test Plan
Added a rountrip unit test.