Add gRPC interface function to request user fields supported by a board/protocol combination #1503
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
silvanocerza
added
type: enhancement
…rd/protocol combination
silvanocerza
force-pushed
the
scerza/grpc-user-field-request
branch
from
26e30ce to
6cbead0
Compare
cmaglie
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2021
umbynos
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2021
d-a-v
pushed a commit
to d-a-v/arduino-cli
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2021
…rd/protocol combination (arduino#1503)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
before creating one)
our contributing guidelines
UPGRADING.mdhas been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)Adds a new gRPC interface function.
gRPC clients have no way to know if a board/protocol combination requires custom user fields.
gRPC clients can now call
SupportedUserFieldsto get a mapping of user fields supported by the specified board/protocol combination.titled accordingly?
Nope.
None.
See how to contribute