Skip to content

Use patched invoke in e2e requirements #423

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 24, 2019
Merged

Use patched invoke in e2e requirements #423

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 24, 2019

Conversation

rsora
Copy link
Contributor

@rsora rsora commented Sep 23, 2019

This PR uses a patched version of invoke in order to overcome flaky test issue reported in previous PR #416, and reported also from other users in the invoke repo (pyinvoke/invoke#660).

This PR applies the following changes:

@rsora rsora marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2019 17:13
Copy link
Contributor

@masci masci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small nit but looks good to me

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ astroid==2.2.5
atomicwrites==1.3.0
attrs==19.1.0
importlib-metadata==0.18
invoke==1.3.0
git+https://github.com/flazzarini/invoke.git
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a comment here stating this is temporary?

Roberto Sora added 3 commits September 24, 2019 10:32
In order to overcome issue reported here
#416
we used successfully this patch
pyinvoke/invoke#661
in the requirements.txt so we re-enable the
test pipeline step for e2e tests on win
@rsora rsora merged commit 373c9c0 into master Sep 24, 2019
@rsora rsora deleted the rsora/e2e-patch branch September 24, 2019 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants