Skip to content

Fix JDT package errors #345

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2025
Merged

Fix JDT package errors #345

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2025

Conversation

SentryMan
Copy link
Collaborator

@SentryMan SentryMan commented Mar 14, 2025

  • It turns out using toString on a package element doesn't print the right package name with some compilers
  • Records with @Property annotations on record components did not generate correctly with JDT

@SentryMan SentryMan added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 14, 2025
@SentryMan SentryMan added this to the 3.1 milestone Mar 14, 2025
@SentryMan SentryMan requested a review from rbygrave March 14, 2025 04:32
@SentryMan SentryMan self-assigned this Mar 14, 2025
@SentryMan SentryMan enabled auto-merge (squash) March 14, 2025 04:32
@SentryMan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

After this, I think we can release 3.1

@SentryMan SentryMan changed the title Fix Package Name JDT Error Fix JDT Errors Mar 14, 2025
@SentryMan SentryMan changed the title Fix JDT Errors Fix JDT Errors and @Property interaction with records Mar 15, 2025
It turns out using toString on a package element doesn't print the right package name with some compilers
@SentryMan SentryMan changed the title Fix JDT Errors and @Property interaction with records Fix JDT package errors Mar 15, 2025
@SentryMan SentryMan merged commit c3a1e40 into avaje:main Mar 15, 2025
5 checks passed
@SentryMan SentryMan deleted the jdt-bug branch March 15, 2025 01:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants