Add no-incorrect-deep-equal rule
#264
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sindresorhus
changed the title
no-incorrect-deep-equal rule
I think it should handle that, as long as the first or second argument is a literal primitive.
👍 |
sindresorhus
requested changes
Jul 2, 2019
Co-Authored-By: Sindre Sorhus <[email protected]>
sindresorhus
requested changes
Jul 5, 2019
|
@MrHen Nice work as usual 👌 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #158.
Does not cover
t.deepEqual(1, expression); // ?situations. Does not fix back todeepEqualif it detects a non-literal inis-- I felt that would be an ambiguous situation in the event that someone actually wanted to compare by reference.