Skip to content

Expand the search space for shapes in from.operation #571

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

michaelhtm
Copy link
Member

Description of changes:
So currently, when you define a from operation path
in generator.yaml fieldConfig, the code-generator checks for
the read_only configuration to decide whether to get the field
from the input shape or the output shape.

The change introduced here tries to retrieve spec fields from input
shapes first, if not found it checks output shape.
If read_only is configured to true, it does so in reverse order
(checks output shape first, if not found, checks input shape)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

So currenly, when you define a `from` `operation` `path`
in generator.yaml fieldConfig, the code-generator checks for
the read_only configuration to decide whether to get the field
from the input shape or the output shape.

The change introduced here tries to retrieve spec fields from input
shapes first, if not found it checks output shape.
If read_only is configured to true, it does so in reverse order
(checks output shape first, if not found, checks input shape)
@ack-prow ack-prow bot requested review from a-hilaly and jlbutler March 6, 2025 00:04
@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

3 similar comments
@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@a-hilaly
Copy link
Member

a-hilaly commented Mar 6, 2025

/retest

1 similar comment
@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@a-hilaly a-hilaly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neat, thanks @michaelhtm !
/lgtm
/retest

@ack-prow ack-prow bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved labels Mar 7, 2025
@a-hilaly
Copy link
Member

a-hilaly commented Mar 7, 2025

/lgtm

@a-hilaly
Copy link
Member

a-hilaly commented Mar 7, 2025

/retest

Copy link

ack-prow bot commented Mar 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: a-hilaly, michaelhtm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

ack-prow bot commented Mar 7, 2025

@michaelhtm: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
verify-attribution 0ef1c66 link false /test verify-attribution
s3-olm-test 0ef1c66 link false /test s3-olm-test
ec2-controller-test 0ef1c66 link true /test ec2-controller-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member Author

Nice

/test ec2-controller-test

@a-hilaly a-hilaly changed the title Allow from operation to take output shapes Expand the search space for shapes in from.operation Mar 7, 2025
@a-hilaly a-hilaly merged commit 5645e51 into aws-controllers-k8s:main Mar 7, 2025
15 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants