Skip to content

docs(api): migrating the event source data classes utility to mkdocstrings #6015

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

leandrodamascena
Copy link
Contributor

Issue number: #5989

Summary

Changes

Update Event Source Data classes utility comments and docstrings to add support for mkdocstrings.

User experience

image

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

  • Migration process documented
  • Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena requested a review from a team February 3, 2025 21:52
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation jmespath JMESPath Functions utility labels Feb 3, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 3, 2025
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena linked an issue Feb 3, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena self-assigned this Feb 3, 2025
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena merged commit d12babf into develop Feb 3, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@leandrodamascena leandrodamascena deleted the mkdocstrings/batch branch February 3, 2025 21:55
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.24%. Comparing base (cf31952) to head (db67993).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #6015   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    96.24%   96.24%           
========================================
  Files          234      234           
  Lines        11017    11017           
  Branches       798      798           
========================================
  Hits         10603    10603           
  Misses         327      327           
  Partials        87       87           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

sinofseven pushed a commit to sinofseven/powertools-lambda-python-my-extend that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation jmespath JMESPath Functions utility size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs: Update data classes utility comments and docstrings
2 participants