Skip to content

fix(amazonq): Fix "Explain" code scan issue #5712

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: feature/q-lsp-chat
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

manodnyab
Copy link
Contributor

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Description

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • A short description of the change has been added to the CHANGELOG if the change is customer-facing in the IDE.
  • I have added metrics for my changes (if required)

License

I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 13, 2025

Qodana Community for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

@manodnyab manodnyab marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2025 21:25
@manodnyab manodnyab requested a review from a team as a code owner May 19, 2025 21:25
"Issue: \"${issueContext["title"]}\" \n" +
"Code: $codeSelection"

val modelPrompt = "Explain the following part of my code \n\n " +
Copy link
Contributor

@zuoyaofu zuoyaofu May 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants