Remove python-dateutil and readerwriterlock dependencies
#976
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
chrisrink10
commented
Aug 18, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Loosen version constraints on some of these dependencies.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove some lightly used dependencies and replacing them with stdlib replacements:
python-dateutilwas only used for parsing#inst "..."tags, which was already supported viadatetime.datetime.fromisoformat, so removing it for now.readerwriterlockwas intended to be a reader-preferring lock for things like Atoms, but it's not been updated in some time and probably wasn't making much of a difference to begin with since Python still has a GIL.