Skip to content

feat: runtime independent examples #21

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 27, 2022
Merged

feat: runtime independent examples #21

merged 5 commits into from
Jun 27, 2022

Conversation

dignifiedquire
Copy link
Contributor

This removes the hard dependency on the runtime of async-std and adds examples of using [email protected] and [email protected] runtimes.

Depends on

cc @jonhoo

@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire requested a review from link2xt June 22, 2022 22:46
dignifiedquire added a commit to chatmail/core that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2022
dignifiedquire added a commit to chatmail/core that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2022
Comment on lines 52 to 57
// TODO: get rid of this
let mut msgs = unsafe { std::pin::Pin::new_unchecked(&mut msgs) };

while let Some(msg) = msgs.next().await {
print!("{:?}", msg?);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

noob question: whats the pin needed for?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it wasn't needed anymore :)

dignifiedquire added a commit to chatmail/core that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2022
dignifiedquire added a commit to chatmail/core that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire merged commit 60ed0ff into master Jun 27, 2022
@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire deleted the runtimes branch June 27, 2022 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants