Skip to content

Brief Introduction page of conda-forge( Reference: issue #374 ) #1323

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
prachinandi opened this issue Apr 5, 2021 · 16 comments
Closed

Brief Introduction page of conda-forge( Reference: issue #374 ) #1323

prachinandi opened this issue Apr 5, 2021 · 16 comments

Comments

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor

prachinandi commented Apr 5, 2021

I took the reference from the issue #374 I would like make changes in the brief introduction page of conda-forge documentation.
would like to re-structure the page and give a precise and brief intro of conda-forge. we can define that as mentioned in https://anaconda.org/conda-forge i.e "A community-led collection of recipes, build infrastructure, and distributions for the conda package manager."

Screenshot (104)

Screenshot (105)
The two questions that are mentioned in the What is conda-forge introduction, instead of answering these two questions in what is conda-forge, they can be shown in FAQ section (in-fact one of the question is already present in FAQ section.

@prachinandi prachinandi changed the title Introduction page of the conda-forge Brief Introduction page of conda-forge( Reference: issue #374 ) Apr 5, 2021
@benny-coy
Copy link
Contributor

Outreachy applicant 2021

Please can i work on this issue?
pls assign me.

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor Author

prachinandi commented Apr 5, 2021

Outreachy applicant 2021

Please can i work on this issue?
pls assign me.

I m working on it 😄

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Outreachy applicant 2021

Please can i work on this issue?
pls assign me.

since, even u r an outreachy applicant I would suggest u to go thru the issues that r labeled with docs.

@PrernaSingh587
Copy link
Contributor

I think we should not entirely remove this section from the intro. It forms the basis. FAQ is for more of technical (and profound) questions. Introduction should definitely have this part. Just my perspective. :)
What do you think @viniciusdc ?

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we should not entirely remove this section from the intro. It forms the basis. FAQ is for more of technical (and profound) questions. Introduction should definitely have this part. Just my perspective. :)
What do you think @viniciusdc ?

What I think, someone who is new to the org, won't be installing the packages or contribute in the first sight. He/she will first flick through the documentation first, and that is the main purpose of having a documentation for an organization. Hence according tto me we shd keep the intro brief and those questions can be added in the relevent sections, infact we have a complete separate section for that, reading those will make every thing clear for a new user.

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor Author

In addition in the issue #374 @ocefpaf had defined conda-forge really well, as someone new to org can easily understand it's purpose😅😄

@PrernaSingh587
Copy link
Contributor

I think we should not entirely remove this section from the intro. It forms the basis. FAQ is for more of technical (and profound) questions. Introduction should definitely have this part. Just my perspective. :)
What do you think @viniciusdc ?

What I think, someone who is new to the org, won't be installing the packages or contribute in the first sight. He/she will first flick through the documentation first, and that is the main purpose of having a documentation for an organization. Hence according tto me we shd keep the intro brief and those questions can be added in the relevent sections, infact we have a complete separate section for that, reading those will make every thing clear for a new user.

But we also have to make it look appealing to them. If there is not a proper introduction, that might be a turn off. When we read something or start to watch something, the intro is what makes the first impression on us. We can't remove the What and Why conda-forge section for sure, that would not be good according to me. And @viniciusdc could better answer if we require a separate section for anything. Though I would still agree with you that the intro has to be re-modified any how. :)

@PrernaSingh587
Copy link
Contributor

In addition in the issue #374 @ocefpaf had defined conda-forge really well, as someone new to org can easily understand it's purposesweat_smilesmile

I think we can take insights from it and come up with something good to redefine the intro. What do you say?

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we should not entirely remove this section from the intro. It forms the basis. FAQ is for more of technical (and profound) questions. Introduction should definitely have this part. Just my perspective. :)
What do you think @viniciusdc ?

What I think, someone who is new to the org, won't be installing the packages or contribute in the first sight. He/she will first flick through the documentation first, and that is the main purpose of having a documentation for an organization. Hence according tto me we shd keep the intro brief and those questions can be added in the relevent sections, infact we have a complete separate section for that, reading those will make every thing clear for a new user.

But we also have to make it look appealing to them. If there is not a proper introduction, that might be a turn off. When we read something or start to watch something, the intro is what makes the first impression on us. We can't remove the What and Why conda-forge section for sure, that would not be good according to me. And @viniciusdc could better answer if we require a separate section for anything. Though I would still agree with you that the intro has to be re-modified any how. :)

aee no I am not asking to remove those two sections, I only had suggested to improve "what is conda-forge" definition

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor Author

In addition in the issue #374 @ocefpaf had defined conda-forge really well, as someone new to org can easily understand it's purposesweat_smilesmile

I think we can take insights from it and come up with something good to redefine the intro. What do you say?

That's what I suggested 😅😄

@viniciusdc
Copy link
Contributor

great! @prachi237 and @PrernaSingh587 thanks for the discussion there, any new insights on this?

@viniciusdc
Copy link
Contributor

BTW, isn't this issue a duplicate of #1282 ?

@prachinandi
Copy link
Contributor Author

prachinandi commented Apr 5, 2021

BTW, isn't this issue a duplicate of #1282 ?

sir I just proposed to look into issue #374 where @ocefpaf had defined conda-forge really well, so if I can add that definition.
if approved I can send PR right now have done the editing in my system.

@viniciusdc
Copy link
Contributor

yes, go ahead! 😄 every PR is welcomed

@PrernaSingh587
Copy link
Contributor

PrernaSingh587 commented Apr 5, 2021

I have raised a PR for this. #1325
@prachi237 You might wanna add to it. Suggestions are welcome.

@viniciusdc
Copy link
Contributor

viniciusdc commented Apr 5, 2021

HI @prachi237 @PrernaSingh587 would you mind closing this issue and post a brief comment in the #1282 and link your PR there too, this will help us to not lose track of things. It can be the exact same content of this issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants