-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Custom predicate #2258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Custom predicate #2258
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2258 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 83.01% 82.91% -0.10%
- Complexity 2340 2348 +8
============================================
Files 307 310 +3
Lines 8324 8369 +45
Branches 768 774 +6
============================================
+ Hits 6910 6939 +29
- Misses 1110 1124 +14
- Partials 304 306 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Getting
Please let me know if the PR has any future so I invest time on creating classes for the API to detach it from the supplementary archives. |
There several ways to achieve this using the frameworks Cucumber integrates with:
So 'm not sure if it is worth the additional complexity of integrating this with the core. |
@mpkorstanje, I understand - thank you for your comment! I'll discuss with the team whether it's worth in our case to upgrade to JUnit 5, as that seems to be the most fit option. Even if we do so, if you see any value in this PR I'm willing to invest some time on it. If not, please just say/feel free to close it. Thanks! |
Is your pull request related to a problem? Please describe.
https://community.smartbear.com/t5/Cucumber-Open/Custom-filters/td-p/213203
My team needs a way to have scenarios filtered in a more customizable way than static tagging. This allows setting new Pickle filters.
Describe the solution you have implemented
Created a new config called customPredicate that can be set to a Predicate to filter out scenarios.