Skip to content

[Java8] Deprecate cucumber-java8 #2277

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

mpkorstanje
Copy link
Contributor

See: #2174

@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje added this to the v7.0.0 milestone Apr 3, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2277 (1177a1a) into v7.x.x (3bc80b9) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             v7.x.x    #2277   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     83.44%   83.44%           
- Complexity     2337     2338    +1     
=========================================
  Files           299      299           
  Lines          8358     8360    +2     
  Branches        760      760           
=========================================
+ Hits           6974     6976    +2     
  Misses         1089     1089           
  Partials        295      295           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...io/cucumber/java8/Java8BackendProviderService.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 3.00 <2.00> (+1.00)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3bc80b9...1177a1a. Read the comment docs.

@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje modified the milestones: v7.0.0, v8.0.0 Apr 3, 2021
@cucumber cucumber deleted a comment Apr 10, 2021
@mpkorstanje mpkorstanje deleted the deprecate-java8 branch January 8, 2022 00:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant